Title | Problem Adaptation Therapy for Older Adults with Chronic Pain and Negative Emotions in Primary Care (PATH-Pain): A Randomized Clinical Trial. |
Publication Type | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2025 |
Authors | Kiosses DN, Ravdin LD, Banerjee S, Wu Y, Henderson CR, Pantelides J, Petti E, Maisano J, Meador L, Kim P, Vaamonde D, M Reid C |
Journal | Am J Geriatr Psychiatry |
Volume | 33 |
Issue | 4 |
Pagination | 345-357 |
Date Published | 2025 Apr |
ISSN | 1545-7214 |
Keywords | Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chronic Pain, Depression, Emotional Regulation, Female, Humans, Male, Pain Management, Pain Measurement, Primary Health Care, Psychosocial Intervention |
Abstract | OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of Problem Adaptation Therapy for Pain (PATH-Pain) versus Usual Care (UC) in reducing pain-related disability, pain intensity, and depression among older adults with chronic pain and negative emotions. DESIGN: RCT assessing the between-group differences during the acute (0-10 weeks) and follow-up (weeks 11-24) phase of treatment. SETTING: A geriatrics primary care site. PARTICIPANTS: 100 participants (80 % females, Mean Age = 75.5) with chronic pain, negative emotions, and varying cognition (56 % had cognitive impairment) were randomly assigned to PATH-Pain (N = 49) or UC (N = 51). INTERVENTIONS: PATH-Pain is a collaborative program which includes a psychosocial intervention designed to improve emotion regulation. UC participants received a booklet that described evidence-based self-management pain strategies. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes: Pain-related disability (Modified Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire), and pain intensity. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Depression (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale), emotion regulation (Emotion Regulation Questionnaire), and treatment satisfaction (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire). RESULTS: During acute treatment (by Week 10), PATH-Pain vs. UC participants showed a significant decrease in pain-related disability [contrast mean difference (CMD) = -1.96, P = 0.02), CI [-0.47, -3.44]] and in depression severity (CMD = -2.50, P = 0.03, CI [-.0.23, -4.76]), but not in pain intensity. PATH-Pain (vs. UC) participants also demonstrated a significant improvement in expressive suppression, an aspect of emotion regulation (CMD = 2.120, P = 0.010, CI [.085, 4.155]). During follow-up (Week 11 to 24), there were no significant between-group differences in pain-related disability, pain intensity, or depression severity. CONCLUSIONS: This primarycarebased study demonstrates the short-term efficacy of PATH-Pain versus UC in reducing pain-related disability and depression in older adults with comorbid chronic pain and negative emotions, as well as varying degrees of cognitive functioning. |
DOI | 10.1016/j.jagp.2024.12.008 |
Alternate Journal | Am J Geriatr Psychiatry |
PubMed ID | 39875212 |
PubMed Central ID | PMC12001379 |
Grant List | UL1 TR002384 / TR / NCATS NIH HHS / United States R01 AG070055 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States R01 AG050514 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States P50 MH113838 / MH / NIMH NIH HHS / United States K24 AG053462 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States P30 AG022845 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States |