Problem Adaptation Therapy for Older Adults with Chronic Pain and Negative Emotions in Primary Care (PATH-Pain): A Randomized Clinical Trial.

TitleProblem Adaptation Therapy for Older Adults with Chronic Pain and Negative Emotions in Primary Care (PATH-Pain): A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2025
AuthorsKiosses DN, Ravdin LD, Banerjee S, Wu Y, Henderson CR, Pantelides J, Petti E, Maisano J, Meador L, Kim P, Vaamonde D, M Reid C
JournalAm J Geriatr Psychiatry
Volume33
Issue4
Pagination345-357
Date Published2025 Apr
ISSN1545-7214
KeywordsAged, Aged, 80 and over, Chronic Pain, Depression, Emotional Regulation, Female, Humans, Male, Pain Management, Pain Measurement, Primary Health Care, Psychosocial Intervention
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of Problem Adaptation Therapy for Pain (PATH-Pain) versus Usual Care (UC) in reducing pain-related disability, pain intensity, and depression among older adults with chronic pain and negative emotions.

DESIGN: RCT assessing the between-group differences during the acute (0-10 weeks) and follow-up (weeks 11-24) phase of treatment.

SETTING: A geriatrics primary care site.

PARTICIPANTS: 100 participants (80 % females, Mean Age = 75.5) with chronic pain, negative emotions, and varying cognition (56 % had cognitive impairment) were randomly assigned to PATH-Pain (N = 49) or UC (N = 51).

INTERVENTIONS: PATH-Pain is a collaborative program which includes a psychosocial intervention designed to improve emotion regulation. UC participants received a booklet that described evidence-based self-management pain strategies.

MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes: Pain-related disability (Modified Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire), and pain intensity.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Depression (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale), emotion regulation (Emotion Regulation Questionnaire), and treatment satisfaction (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire).

RESULTS: During acute treatment (by Week 10), PATH-Pain vs. UC participants showed a significant decrease in pain-related disability [contrast mean difference (CMD) = -1.96, P = 0.02), CI [-0.47, -3.44]] and in depression severity (CMD = -2.50, P = 0.03, CI [-.0.23, -4.76]), but not in pain intensity. PATH-Pain (vs. UC) participants also demonstrated a significant improvement in expressive suppression, an aspect of emotion regulation (CMD = 2.120, P = 0.010, CI [.085, 4.155]). During follow-up (Week 11 to 24), there were no significant between-group differences in pain-related disability, pain intensity, or depression severity.

CONCLUSIONS: This primarycarebased study demonstrates the short-term efficacy of PATH-Pain versus UC in reducing pain-related disability and depression in older adults with comorbid chronic pain and negative emotions, as well as varying degrees of cognitive functioning.

DOI10.1016/j.jagp.2024.12.008
Alternate JournalAm J Geriatr Psychiatry
PubMed ID39875212
PubMed Central IDPMC12001379
Grant ListUL1 TR002384 / TR / NCATS NIH HHS / United States
R01 AG070055 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
R01 AG050514 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
P50 MH113838 / MH / NIMH NIH HHS / United States
K24 AG053462 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
P30 AG022845 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States